This is apparently what the French of 1910 though the world of the year 2000 would be like: Machine Gun Jousting!

More here.

This one is curious:

What the function of the book grinder? Is it merely disposing of the obsolete education tools since they’ve been supplanted by the audio input of the headphones, or is it converting the knowledge into data to be installed into the students’ heads, a la The Matrix?

If only the French were around today to answer these questions.

Newsweek has a story on an upcoming experiment in Switzerland to find some thing called the Hoggs boson, or what is more fabulously named The God Particle.   If successful, this God Particle could answer everything ever asked, and we’ll all either call Steven Hawking a chump or crown him King of the Best Planet Ever.

Anything that makes religious nutjobs look even more foolish is a-okay in our book.  But we must keep in mind that the God Particle may not want to be found, much like if your employee tracked you down in the Bahamas to ask you to sign the timecards.

The God Particle may throw a fit and impulsively destroy the world by creating a tiny black hole with the singularity centered in Zurich.

Which would be an awesome way to go, and we could blame the Swiss.  A win win.

They’re not so much shredded as sliced….uh….widthwise?  But they fall apart and look like they’re shredded.

Anyway, this is very simple:

Melt some butter in a big pan and throw in the heaping mound.  It’ll look like it all won’t fit but it’ll reduce.  Fry or saute or whatever you want to call it for a while, and eventually throw in a bunch of chopped garlic, salt, and pepper.  And just keep it going for however done you want it, but I like my brussel sprouts pretty done.  There might be some reason for putting in the salt earlier to draw out extra moisture, but whatever.  And may want to do the garlic first but it might burn.

I’m not a chef but I watch a lot of Alton Brown.

Our Fidgeting Society

March 20, 2008

Um yeah, so it’s been five months since our last message from the future.  This is what happens when life distracts one from one’s pointless rants about theme parks and cartoons, when one ceaselessly seeks out an elusive dwelling to purchase, and when one’s occupation supplants one’s precious spare moments.  Oh, and getting engaged.

Also, video games.

Anyway, back to Disneyland.  An recent article in the LA Times profiled the upcoming, and much needed, addition to Disney’s Californialand.  Midway Mania is designed along the likes of Buzz Lightyear over in the better park, in that you sit in a slow-moving vehicle and shoot things with a laser.  This is a wonderful and popular idea, since lots of people like Disney rides and shooting things, so it’s a match made in Heaven, a chocolate/peanut butter sort of thing.

But then the last time we went on the ride, my Wife of the Future suggested that we not bother with the laser guns and simply enjoy the ride.  I had already been on the ride several times before, but I was amazed at how much I was missing because I was too busy trying to murder Emperor Zurg: tiny in-jokes, artistic touches, nuance and so forth.  The details that Disney is known for, even for a ride that’s pretty simple and minimalist by comparison.  Normally, there’s no time to take it all in since you’re focusing on the light-up targets.  I actually enjoyed the ride more after sitting back and looking at it.

So when Midway Mania is described as a “a ride-through 3-D video game,” I get a little annoyed.  And nervous.  I mean, I have video games at home.  Even ones where I can step in time (it’s the master) to pop music as well as swing a pretend tennis racket.  You know, interactive games (though what kind of video game is not interactive?).  So why would I need to drive ninety miles to play one?  What’s wrong with an old-fashioned ride where Disney does all the work to entertain me, you young whippersnappers?

Maybe it’s not a trend, but when Midway Mania opens, two of the last five rides in the resort will be this interactive type.  That may not seem like a lot, but they don’t add rides all that often!

Disney is putting forth so much effort, time, and money in creating these interactive rides.  Why not?  The line for Buzz Lightyear has been consistently long for three years now, while poor Monsters Inc., a much more immersive and impressive ride, has apparently lost its novelty and so its line dwindles.  Why?  Because Buzz Lightyear is apparently more fun for people because they’re doing something.

And who doesn’t like doing something?  I do something all the time.  But we’ve been becoming more and more a society that cannot stand not doing something.

When Disneyland first opened, there was barely anything to do.  A few slow rides, a few shows, but still, millions of people came and handed out money freely.  It was fun to go and just look at everything, to experience the park.  Again, the novelty doesn’t last, and so more rides were added, bigger, faster, and more visceral.  And the park became even more fun than before.  But that doesn’t seem to be enough anymore.  The audience is less content about simply being an audience.  Moving through a story is not as rewarding as being a part of it.

Now we need joysticks and triggers to be entertained.  We’re like cigarette junkies looking for something to do with our fingers.  We need higher scores.

We at Men of Science support and encourage technology and toys, but every now and then, we should ignore the targets, put down the laser cannons, unplug your damn earbuds, and instead take in the artistry of a fabricated environment.

Now get off my lawn.